Is Lobster A Healthy Or Unhealthy Food?

modern day, it seems that nearly everything we eatfish, clams, crabs, mussels and sea urchins. Lobsters
carries the risk of being unhealthy. Eating fish hasdo eat dead bait in traps, but humans eat dead fish
known health benefits, yet some species of fish maytoo! Ask any lobsterman, and they will tell you: the
contain unsafe levels of mercury and PCB's. Eatingfresher the bait, the better it will "fish." This is trade
fresh fruit is known to be healthy, yet many fruitslanguage which, when translated, means that if you
are sprayed with chemical pesticides the residues ofput fresh bait in your traps it will attract more
which are of questionable risk. The same can be saidlobsters. Old bait does not attract many lobsters at
of vegetables.all.
Whether the above mentioned food items areWhen fish gets old and borderline saleable at a
healthy or unhealthy is beyond the scope of thisseafood market, it begins to emit an ammonia smell.
article. It does point out, though, that the debateAt that point, which can be about 5 to 7 days after
continues on which foods contribute to good health,being caught, it is no longer appealing to humans. It is
and which foods pose a health risk. This article willthe same for lobsters. They prefer live, fresh food,
present information for the reader to determinebut will eat dead bait in traps if it is fresh and not old.
which camp lobster belongs in: healthy or unhealthy.This last argument against lobster as a healthy food
Let's start with the few arguments that put forthis the weakest and not based upon fact at all, but
the case that lobster is unhealthy. There are notrather on fallacy: lobsters eat primarily live food, not
many. We've read that one doctor advises againstdecaying, rotting dead fish.
eating lobster because it may contain parasites andNow we'll look at the factors in favor of lobster
viruses. Nothing like pointing out the obvious. Everybeing a healthy food.
living creature on Earth may contain parasites andThere are several health reasons that lobster should
viruses, which is why any animal-based food productbe eaten. The first comes from the American Heart
should be cooked before being eaten. CookingAssociations Page on Fish and Omega-3 Fatty Acids
eliminates this risk. One risk that cooking will notwhich recommends eating fish at least 2 times per
eliminate is excess levels of mercury. No matter howweek. A quote from the American Heart Association
much you cook any fish or seafood item, it will notis worth sharing here, "Fish is a good source of
remove mercury.protein and doesn't have the high saturated fat that
How much mercury does lobster have? Before wefatty meat products do."
answer that question, we need to look a little atLobster is indeed an excellent source of lean protein.
mercury and the reasons it is in seafood to begin100 grams of lobster meat contains 98 calories, 21
with. The FDA states in their report "What you needgrams of protein, and only 0.6 grams of fat. Contrast
to know about mercury in fish and shellfish" thatthat to 100 grams of white, skinless chicken meat
"nearly all fish and shellfish contain traces of mercury"which has 168 calories, 31 grams of protein, and 3.6
and that "Mercury occurs naturally in the environmentgrams of fat. Gram for gram, even skinless chicken
and can also be released into the air through industrialcontains in excess of 500% more fat than lobster.
pollution. Mercury falls from the air and canLean beef contains more than 10 times as much fat
accumulate in streams and oceans."as lobster. Obviously, lobster is an excellent source of
What can be gleaned from this report are two facts.lean protein.
One, that all fish and shellfish contain traces ofLobster is more than just a lean source of protein.
mercury. Two, Mercury occurs naturally as well. IfLobster also contains Omega-3 fatty acids, which are
mercury occurs naturally, it is probably safe toassociated with good heart health. There are several
assume that all fish and shellfish have alwaysvaluable benefits from a diet which regularly contains
contained traces of mercury. Which begs theOmega-3 fatty acids. Again quoting from the
question: are mercury levels in fish and shellfish anyAmerican Heart Association, "The ways that
higher now than they were 50 or 100 years ago?omega-3 fatty acids reduce CVD (cardio-vascular
The answer is that scientists do no know for sure,disease) risk are still being studied. However, research
as tests for mercury in fish were not done backhas shown that they decrease risk of arrhythmias,
then. Regardless, the FDA lists four fish varieties thatwhich can lead to sudden cardiac death, decrease
have higher level of mercury than all others: shark,triglyceride levels, decrease growth rate of
swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish. They also listatherosclerotic plaque, and lower blood pressure
five that are very low in mercury: shrimp, canned(slightly)." The report further states, "Large-scale
light tuna, salmon, pollock and catfish. Lobster isepidemiologic studies suggest that people at risk for
closer to the 5 on the low end than the 4 on thecoronary heart disease benefit from consuming
high end.omega-3 fatty acids from plants and marine sources."
Even the 4 fish varieties that have higher levels ofLobster does not contain as much Omega-3 fatty
mercury are safe to eat in moderation for all peopleacids as salmon, which has the highest content, but is
other than pregnant mothers, and mothers nursinga good source nonetheless.
infant children. It is only these 4 varieties that shouldIn summary, lobster is high in protein, extremely low
be avoided in the two circumstances just mentioned.in fat, is a beneficial source of Omega-3 fatty acids
Lobster is not included in the list of fish to avoidwhich are healthy for the heart and reduce the
when pregnant.growth rate of plaque. Lobsters feed primarily on live
The final argument against lobster that we havefood: fish, crabs, clams and mussels. Lobster have a
heard is not based on science at all. The argument isvery healthy diet which would be beneficial to
that lobsters are bottom feeders and eat decayinghumans, not harmful to them.
and rotting fish that sink to the bottom. The logic ofThere you have the arguments for and against
the argument is that since lobsters are eating theselobster as a healthy food source. The evidence
things that aren't healthy for people, people shouldn'tsuggests lobster is a very healthy food choice. Not
be eating lobsters. The problem with this argument isonly is it very healthy, it tastes absolutely
that it is not based on facts. The fact is that lobstersextravagant. Enjoy your lobster!
eat mainly live food. Their primary diet consists of live